User agent detail

Nokia7020/2.0 (08.10) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia7020) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
UC Browser 9.4 Gecko Nokia7020mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia7020 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close Nokia7020mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Symbian Nokia7020smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1close Nokia7020closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.377 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7020closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Nokia7020mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close Nokia7020Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.089 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:49 | by ThaDafinser