User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; CT1000 Build/KRT16S) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.76 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 46.0.2490.76Android 4.4Blink CarrefourCT1000tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4CarrefourCT1000tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeAndroid 4.4CelkonCT1000closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76WebKit 537.36Android 4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Android 4.4CT1000tabletyescloseclose0.10301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:49 | by ThaDafinser