User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv6l; Opera TV Store/5450; TOSHIBA;E8E0B7F82B9B;BDX5400KB; 0.33) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/toshiba.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.362ToshibaBDX5400 Blu-ray Playertelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.10Presto GNU/Linux ToshibaNook Colortv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12.362Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 ToshibaBDX5400 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:49 | by ThaDafinser