User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/528.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.156.1 Safari/528.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Dev 2.0.156.1Windows VistaWebkit 528.8desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 2.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Desktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 2.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 2.0.156closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.12901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 2.0.156.1WebKit 528.8Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 2.0.156.1Webkit 528.8Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:47 | by ThaDafinser