User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Chrome 33FreeBSD Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink FreeBSD Desktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink FreeBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117WebKit 537.36FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:47 | by ThaDafinser