User agent detail

LenovoS899t_TD/1.0 Android/4.0 Release/02.01.2012 Browser/WAP2.0 appleWebkit/534.30; 360browser(securitypay,securityinstalled); 360 Aphone Browser (Version 3.0.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 3.0.2Android 4.0Webkit 534.30LenovoS899mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
appleWebkit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Qihoo 360 Browser 3.0.2closeAndroid 4.0LenovoS899mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Phone Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoHN3-U00smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0LenovoS899t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.30Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 3.0.2Webkit 534.30Android 4.0LenovoS899mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:47 | by ThaDafinser