User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140129 Firefox/24.0 PaleMoon/24.3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Pale Moon 24.3.1Windows 8Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 24.3Gecko 24.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 24.3.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 24.3Gecko Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 24.3.1closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 24.3.1closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 24.3.1Gecko 20140129Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.57006 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 24.3.1Gecko 24.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:47 | by ThaDafinser