User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; U; C6-01; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Qt/4.7.4 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaC6-01 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Symbian^3 yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeSymbian^3 NokiaC6-01closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt 4.7.4Webkit 534.3Series60 5.2NokiaC6-01mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:44 | by ThaDafinser