User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021029 Phoenix/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Phoenix 0.4GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.2Gecko 1.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Phoenix (old name for Firefox) 0.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Phoenix 0.4Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Phoenix 0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phoenix 0.4closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Phoenix 0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix 0.4Gecko 20021029Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:44 | by ThaDafinser