User agent detail

SonyEricssonU5atUCBrowser/8.7.1.234/50/405/UCWEB
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU5atUCBrowser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonU5atUCBrowser 8.7.1.234closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser Sony EricssonVivazfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.1close SonyEricssonU5atUCBrowsercloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.1.234 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U5atUCBrowsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Sony EricssonU5atmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:43 | by ThaDafinser