User agent detail

Android 4.0.3;AppleWebKit/534.30;Build/IML74K;QS0716D Build/IML74K
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Android Browser Android 4.0.3WebKit 3QQS0716Dtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.33QQoo! Q-Pad QS0716Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.03QQS0716Dtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3QS0716Dcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.33QQoo! Q-Pad QS0716Dtabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.168 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:42 | by ThaDafinser