User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; A500 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 33.0.1750.166Android 4.0.3Blink AcerIconia Tab A500tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0AcerPicassoTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0AcerIconia Tab A500tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.3AcerA500closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3AcerAcer Iconia A500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.0.3AcerIconia Tab A500tabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.0AcerA500Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:42 | by ThaDafinser