User agent detail

LG-LG501C[TF268435460902158060463040012072105617] Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG501C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.081 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG501C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close LGLG501Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LG501Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LG501Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 LGLGLG501Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGLG501Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG501CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:42 | by ThaDafinser