User agent detail

MT6735_TD/V1 Linux/3.10.72+ Android/5.1 Release/03.03.2015 Browser/AppleWebKit537.36 Chrome/39.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 System/Android 5.1;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Chrome 39.0Android 5.1unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeAndroid 5.1MT6735mobile-browseryescloseclose0.41604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 39.0Blink Android 5.1smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.0.0closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 39.0.0closeAndroid 5.1closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.0.0WebKit Android 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 39Webkit 537.36Android 5.1MT6735mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:41 | by ThaDafinser