User agent detail

Instagram 3.4.0 Android (10/2.3.6; 240dpi; 480x800; samsung; SCH-R760; SCH-R760; smdkc210; en_US)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-R760 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Instagram App 3.4WebKit Android AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Instagram closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid Samsung; SCH-R760; SCH-R760; smdkc210; enmobile-browseryescloseclose0.31503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungSCH-R760smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSCH-R760closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android Samsung; SCH-R760; SCH-R760; smdkc210; enmobile:smartyescloseclose0.11501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:41 | by ThaDafinser