User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A328 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.93 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 39.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 39.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 39Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA328Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:41 | by ThaDafinser