User agent detail

Nokia6750-1b/2.0(ATT.4.61) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6750-1b Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia6750-1bsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0(ATT.4.61)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia6750-1bcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6750-1bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420 Nokia6750-1bmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia6750 MuralFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:41 | by ThaDafinser