User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; PAD 9720QR Build/PAD 9719QR) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
XoroPAD 9720QR Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.119 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.30503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.2XoroPAD 9720QRcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.15702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.2PAD 9720QRtabletyescloseclose0.09701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:41 | by ThaDafinser