User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.24pre) Gecko/20100228 K-Meleon/1.5.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
K-Meleon 1.5WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
K-Meleon 1.5Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
K-meleon 1.5Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
K-Meleon 1.5.4Gecko 20100228Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
K-Meleon 1.5.4Gecko 1.8.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:40 | by ThaDafinser