User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (HW-HUAWEI_C8500/C8500V100R001C92B234;U;Android/2.1;240*320;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 Mobile Safari/530.17 parameters/{scr=427_320,cm=1,ql=l,imei=a0000020ccd264,bm=1,eng=adrmini7,mdm=1,mdl=C8500,ps=1} tiantian(securitypay)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.1Webkit 530.17HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1HTCadrmini7smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 2.1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 530.17Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.55306 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:40 | by ThaDafinser