User agent detail

Opera/9.80(Linux armv6I; Opera TV Store/5530; Smart-BD; M; Linux/SmartBD; B-HM5160; Mediatek) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.11 (3c:07:71:e7:5a:2c BDP-S1200_EUR M19.D.0046 M19.R.0035 M)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.362SonyBDP-S1200 Blu-ray Playertelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.11Presto GNU/Linux tv0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11 (3c:07:71:e7:5a:2c BDP-S1200_EUR M19.D.0046 M19.R.0035 M)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.362Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 SonyBDP-S1200 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:40 | by ThaDafinser