User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-puffin.yaml
Chrome 30Linux Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:40 | by ThaDafinser