User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3650-ORANGE/S3650BVII5 SHP/VPP/R5 Jasmine/1.0 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S3650-ORANGE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Jasmine 1.0NetFront JAVA SamsungGT-S3650Mobile Phoneyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S3650-ORANGE S3650BVII5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT-S3650mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Jasmine 1.0 SamsungGT-S3650smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT-S3650-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Jasmine 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.0 Touchwiz 2.0 or earlierSamsungCorbymobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S3650Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:40 | by ThaDafinser