User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.1; Series60/3.0 NokiaE61i-1/3.0; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE61i-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.1Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.0NokiaE61i-1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 3.0;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.0closeSymbian OS 9.1NokiaE61i-1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.0closeSymbianOS 9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.17202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia E61i-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.0NokiaE61imobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:39 | by ThaDafinser