User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2159.4 Safari/537.36 OPR/26.0.1646.0 (Edition developer)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Developer 26.0OS X Yosemite 10.10Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 26.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.091 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 26.0.1646.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 26.0.1646.0closeOS X 10.10.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 26.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 26.0.1646.0closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 26.0.1646closeMac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2159.4closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 26.0.1646.0WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Developer 26.0Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 26.0.1646.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 26.0.1632.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:39 | by ThaDafinser