User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:33.1.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.1.1 anonymized by Abelssoft 780246616
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Firefox 33.0Win7 6.133.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 33.0Gecko 33.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.188 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 33.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 33.1.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 33.1Gecko Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 33.1.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 33.1.1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 33.1.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 33.1.1Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 33.1.1Gecko 33.1.1Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 33.1.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 33.0closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:39 | by ThaDafinser