User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Chinese Operating System 2.0; HTC 9089)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-cos.yaml
COS 2.0 HTC9089mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeCOS 2.0HTC9089mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTC9089smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Systemclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTC9089closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
COS 2.0HTC9089mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:39 | by ThaDafinser