User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; BIDUBrowser 2.6)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Baidu Spark 2.6Windows XPTrident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Spark 2.6Trident Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 2.6Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:38 | by ThaDafinser