User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; OpenVMS HP_rx2660__(1.42GHz/6.0MB); xx; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081201 BonEcho/2.0.0.18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.18OpenVMS Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
HP Secure Web Browser 1.8 OpenVMS Desktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.18closeOpenVMS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko 0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.031 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.18close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.18Gecko 20081201a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.18Gecko 1.8.1OpenVMS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:38 | by ThaDafinser