User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5630C_CMCC/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Release/17.08.2008 Browser/NetFront3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configura
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5630C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5630C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT-S5630Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront NetFront SamsungGT-S5630Csmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S5630Ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungGT-S5630Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S5630CFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:38 | by ThaDafinser