User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-in; lg-gt350) UCBrowser8.2.1.144/69/444/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGgt350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 LGgt350smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.1close LGgt350closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.1.144 LGLGgt350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko LGgt350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:37 | by ThaDafinser