User agent detail

Layar/4.0 Android/2.2 (Samsung GT-I5510)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I5510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Layar 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGalaxy 551mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGT-I5510smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I5510closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy 551mobile:smartyescloseclose0.11001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:37 | by ThaDafinser