User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/1.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-703.php
Seznam Browser 1.2WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 1.2Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:37 | by ThaDafinser