User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; IM-A760S_Optimus Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechIM-A760S_Optimus Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.0.4PantechIM-A760S_Optimuscloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.0.4PantechVega Racermobile:smartyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.065 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:37 | by ThaDafinser