User agent detail

hi5/4.0.3/an GT-N8020(samsung/p4noteltexx/p4notelte:4.1.2/JZO54K/N8020XXBMF2:user/release-keys)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungp4noteltexx Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
hi5 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Samsungp4noteltexxmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGALAXY Note 10.1" LTEtabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsungp4noteltexxcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsungp4noteltexxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:36 | by ThaDafinser