User agent detail

0HuaweiU5705/Huawei/1.0/B100 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q05A MMS/Obigo-MMS/Q05A SyncML/HW-SyncML/1.0 Java/HWJa/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Player/QTV-Player/5.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiU5705 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.079 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
0HuaweiU5705 Huaweicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Huawei1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close HuaweiU5705closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.21102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A HuaweiU5705mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:36 | by ThaDafinser