User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2305.3 Safari/537.36 OPR/29.0.1794.0 (Edition developer)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Developer 29.0Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 29.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 29.0.1794.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 29.0.1794.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 29.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 29.0.1794.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 29.0.1794closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 42.0.2305.3closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 29.0.1794.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Developer 29.0Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 29.0.1794.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 29.0.1794.0closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:36 | by ThaDafinser