User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020414 CentOS/3.0.6-1.el5.centos Firefox/3.0.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.0.6CentOS 3.0.6Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18806 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko CentOS 3.0desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.6closeCentOS closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.6Gecko 2009020414Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40712 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.6Gecko 1.9.0CentOS 5desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:35 | by ThaDafinser