User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; U; E6-00; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 7_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Websearch Ultimate /4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16/1.1 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE6-00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.094 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 528.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18406 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.1NokiaMobilefeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 7.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 7.1closeiOS 7.1NokiaE6-00closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3iOS 7.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59118 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.3Series60 5.2NokiaE6-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:35 | by ThaDafinser