User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; TPC7102 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Mobile Safari/537.22 OPR/14.0.1025.53005
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ChangJiaTPC7102 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.087 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1025.53005closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 14.0.1025.53005closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28008 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 14.0Presto Android 4.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1025.53005closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 14.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4ChangJiaTPC7102closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.12504 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 14.0.1025.53005WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40312 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 14.0Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4TPC7102mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1025.53005closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.085 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:35 | by ThaDafinser