User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LIFETAB_S1033X Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 39.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoLifetab S1033XTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoLifetab S1033XTabletyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25408 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.4MedionLifetab S1033Xtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 39.0.2171closeAndroid 4.4.2MedionLifetab S1033Xcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36911 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 39Blink Android 4.4.2MedionLifetab S1033Xtabletyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 39closeAndroid 4.4MedionS1033XTabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:34 | by ThaDafinser