User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) MiniBowserM/3.0 Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-minibrowser.yaml
MiniBrowser 3.0Series60 Webkit 534.3mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.3closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.3Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41012 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MiniBrowser 3.0Webkit 534.3Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:34 | by ThaDafinser