User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.1; ru; CinemaTV_3G) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.2.389 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.0Android 4.2unknown ExplayCinemaTV 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android 4.2ExplayCinemaTV 3GTabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27508 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0 Android 4.2yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 4.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10603 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.389 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42013 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android 4.2.1CinemaTV 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.08401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:34 | by ThaDafinser