User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; scooter; .NET CLR 1.0.3705)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
scooter Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19106 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesScooter0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesscooterclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40712 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:34 | by ThaDafinser