User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/2.0.7961
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
Puffin 2.0Linux Webkit 534.35desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.088 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 2.0.7961closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18506 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 2.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 2.0.7961closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10403 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 2.0.7961WebKit 534.35 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42013 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 2.0Webkit 534.35Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser