User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11A465
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-369.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.124 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.51.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.0closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41112 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.3closeiOS 7.0.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser