User agent detail

Lenovo A780/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/2.3.5 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Configuration
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA780 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA780mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24807 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA780smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA780closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40612 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5LenovoA780mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA780Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.088 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser