User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo 3DS; U; ; de) Version/1.7552.EU
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
1.7552 Nintendo3DSgaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NX NetFront Nintendo3DSConsoleyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 1.7552.EUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront Nintendo Mobile 3DSNintendo3DSconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close Nintendo3DScloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netfront Browser NX 1.7552.EUNetFront NintendoNintendo 3DScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52016 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
1.7552Nintendo3DSgaming:portableyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Nintendo 3DS closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWiiSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser