User agent detail

Lenovo-A388t_TD/S100 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.1.2 Release/07.30.2013 Browser/AppleWebkit534.30 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Android 4.1Android 4.1unknown LenovoA388TMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.1WebKit Android 4.1LenovoA388TMobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2LenovoA388mobile-browseryescloseclose0.3421 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1LenovoA388tsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2LenovoA388t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09803 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2LenovoA388mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.1closeAndroid 4.1LenovoA388tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser