User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 LG/481586400 Firefox/2.0.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG481586400 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.4closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19306 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Mac LG481586400smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeMac OS X LG481586400closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.4Gecko 20070515Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile 2.0.0.4Gecko 1.8.1OS X LG481586400mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser